<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My Internet Time Card &#187; crackberry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justincresswell.com/tag/crackberry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justincresswell.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:37:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Mobile phone addiction numbers from Men&#8217;s Health a little surprising</title>
		<link>http://justincresswell.com/2008/11/mobile-phone-addiction-numbers-from-mens-health-a-little-surprising/</link>
		<comments>http://justincresswell.com/2008/11/mobile-phone-addiction-numbers-from-mens-health-a-little-surprising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 13:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Cresswell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[menshealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justincresswell.com/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Blackberry Crackberry addiction is documented already, and now so are the relative levels of addiction of the nation.  Men&#8217;s Health published the most and least &#8220;Cell-Addicted Cities&#8221; and it includes some surprises.  Here are the the least-addicted cities:
1. Hartford, CT
2. Buffalo, NY
3. Baltimore, MD
4. Wilmington, DE
5. St. Louis, MO
6. Rochester, NY
7. Newark, NJ
8. Chicago, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a title="http://justincresswell.com/2008/10/slatecom-the-mind-blackberry-problem/" href="http://justincresswell.com/2008/10/slatecom-the-mind-blackberry-problem/" target="_self">Blackberry Crackberry addiction is documented</a> already, and now so are the relative levels of addiction of the nation.  Men&#8217;s Health published the most and least &#8220;<a title="http://www.menshealth.com/metrogrades/08_nov_cellphones/cellphones.html" href="http://www.menshealth.com/metrogrades/08_nov_cellphones/cellphones.html" target="_blank">Cell-Addicted Cities</a>&#8221; and it includes some surprises.  Here are the the least-addicted cities:</p>
<p>1. Hartford, CT</p>
<p>2. Buffalo, NY</p>
<p>3. Baltimore, MD</p>
<p>4. Wilmington, DE</p>
<p>5. St. Louis, MO</p>
<p>6. Rochester, NY</p>
<p>7. Newark, NJ</p>
<p>8. Chicago, IL</p>
<p>9. Bangor, ME</p>
<p>10. Detroit, MI</p>
<p>Bangor makes sense, but none of the others do.  All those cities, including Hartford, the <a title="http://www.hartford.gov/history/default.htm" href="http://www.hartford.gov/history/default.htm" target="_blank">so-called insurance capital of the world</a> (<a title="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/21/nyregion/21HART.html?ex=1384837200&amp;en=99929c8279ab16d4&amp;ei=5007&amp;partner=USERLAND" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/21/nyregion/21HART.html?ex=1384837200&amp;en=99929c8279ab16d4&amp;ei=5007&amp;partner=USERLAND" target="_blank">or not</a>) with their populations of smartphone-toting professionals and academic communities aren&#8217;t heavy users?  Chicago?  Detroit?  Strange.  Makes me wonder why Men&#8217;s Health chose not to put their methodology on the page.  The magazine should really include some form of explaination.  How is this calculated?  I want to know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justincresswell.com/2008/11/mobile-phone-addiction-numbers-from-mens-health-a-little-surprising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
